Political editor
Trump leaves door open to renewed negotiations US President Donald Trump has signalled that Washington could return to negotiations with Iran, even as diplomatic efforts remain stalled and tensions continue around the Strait of Hormuz.
Asked Wednesday whether the United States would return to the negotiating table, Trump said talks could resume “maybe at some point,” while arguing that the current situation was favourable to Washington.
The comments came just days after Trump said there were no talks underway or scheduled with Tehran, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the diplomatic track. Economic pressure replaces immediate military escalation
Trump has simultaneously announced a major new campaign of economic pressure against Iran. He described it as the most severe economic operation against a country and warned nations and businesses assisting Tehran that they could face serious consequences.
The shift follows the collapse of a 60-day negotiating period established under a June memorandum aimed at finding a broader settlement to the conflict. The deadline expired on August 17 without an agreement.
Strait of Hormuz remains the central dispute. At the heart of the confrontation is the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy routes.
Trump says the waterway is open and that the United States has control of it. Iran maintains that the strait remains effectively closed and has demanded an end to the US blockade and military pressure before normal shipping can resume. Shipping data indicates that traffic remains far below normal levels. Reuters reported that only nine commodity vessels passed through the strait on both Tuesday and Wednesday, underscoring the continuing disruption despite Washington’s claim that the route is operating.
Continued on Page 6
Business
$3.2 Billion Monthly Bill: Pakistan Battles Energy Crisis with Solar Push

Sajjad Azhar
The Strait of Hormuz has once again emerged as a critical artery of the global economy, with rising tensions pushing oil prices to nearly double their previous levels. Since the onset of the crisis, energy markets have experienced unprecedented volatility, sending shockwaves across importing nations—particularly Pakistan.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif recently informed the federal cabinet that Pakistan’s oil import bill has surged dramatically due to soaring global prices. Weekly imports, which previously stood at around $300 million, have now climbed to nearly $800 million. This has pushed the monthly energy import cost from $1.2 billion to approximately $3.2 billion.
Experts warn that if the crisis persists, Pakistan could face an additional burden of nearly $2 billion per month, placing further strain on an already fragile economy.
The Strait of Hormuz is responsible for nearly 25% of global oil shipments and around 30% of LNG trade, making it one of the most strategic and vulnerable chokepoints in the world. Before the crisis, around 100 oil and gas tankers passed through daily; that number has reportedly dropped to nearly a tenth, disrupting supply chains globally.
Analysts suggest that the current energy disruption is more severe than the oil shocks of the 1970s, when global supply fell by only around 5%. The present decline is significantly higher, sending global economies into uncertainty.
Pakistan, already among the vulnerable economies, imports large volumes of energy from Gulf countries. It ranks among the top five importers of oil and third in LNG dependence. In response, authorities have introduced emergency energy conservation measures, including early closure of markets at 8 PM and partial work-from-home policies for several days a week. Further restrictions may be imposed if the crisis deepens.
Solar Revolution: A Silent Energy Shift in Pakistan
While the global energy crisis intensifies, Pakistan is witnessing an unexpected transformation in its energy landscape—driven not by government planning but by market forces.
A recent report by Renewable First and the Karachi School of Business and Leadership (KSBL) revealed that Pakistan imported nearly $18 billion worth of solar panels over the past five years, with a total installed capacity of around 50 gigawatts.
Unlike state-driven energy transitions, this solar boom has been largely organic. As electricity prices soared beyond consumer affordability, households and businesses independently shifted towards solar energy. Government support through net metering policies and duty exemptions further accelerated adoption.
From just 1 gigawatt in 2018, solar imports have surged to over 51 gigawatts annually by 2026, marking one of the fastest solar transitions globally. Analysts say Pakistan has achieved a level of solar penetration unmatched by many developed economies in such a short span.
$12 Billion Saved in Energy Imports
The shift towards renewable energy has already begun reshaping Pakistan’s import bill. Between 2022 and 2024, oil and LNG imports fell by nearly 40%, as dependence on furnace oil and gas-fired power generation declined.
According to energy researcher Rabia Babar of Renewable First, Pakistan has already saved more than $12 billion in foreign exchange due to the solar transition. If current trends continue, an additional $6.3 billion in savings is expected by the end of this year.
This rapid transformation has also left Pakistan with surplus LNG import contracts, prompting authorities to explore global resale options and renegotiate agreements.
A Turning Point in Energy Strategy
While neighbouring economies such as China, India, and South Korea continue increasing LNG imports, Pakistan has taken a different trajectory—reducing reliance on fossil fuels through rapid solar adoption.
The government now aims to meet 60% of its energy demand from renewable sources within the next four years, reducing dependence on imported oil and shielding the economy from global shocks.
Experts argue that without this solar revolution, Pakistan’s current energy crisis would have been far more severe, potentially deepening load-shedding and economic instability.
As global energy markets remain uncertain, Pakistan’s evolving energy mix may offer a rare case study in how crisis-driven adaptation can reshape a country’s long-term economic resilience.
Saif Ali Khan
The unemployment rate has declined in the latest report, offering a positive sign for the economy and labor market. According to newly released data, more people are finding jobs as businesses continue to expand hiring across multiple sectors.
Economists note that the drop in unemployment reflects steady economic growth, with industries such as technology, healthcare, and retail contributing significantly to job creation. Increased consumer demand and business confidence have also played a role in encouraging companies to take on new employees.
While the overall trend is encouraging, analysts caution that challenges remain. Wage growth has been uneven, and some regions continue to experience higher levels of joblessness than others. Additionally, concerns about inflation and global economic uncertainty could impact future hiring patterns.
Government officials have welcomed the news, highlighting it as evidence that current economic policies are supporting job creation. However, they emphasize the importance of continued investment in skills training and education to ensure long-term workforce stability. Overall, the falling unemployment rate marks a step forward, though experts agree that sustained efforts will be needed to maintain momentum and ensure that the benefits of economic growth are widely shared.
Moreover, Unemployment fell to 4.9% in the three months to February, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said, despite predictions it would remain unchanged at 5.2%. However, the drop has been driven by the inactivity rate – which measures those people not actively seeking work and who are not included in the jobless figures. Wages rose at an annual pace of 3.6% between December and February, the weakest rate since late 2020. Despite the slowdown, pay is still rising faster than inflation.
Sajjad Azhar:
As fears of a prolonged conflict in the Middle East grow, its economic aftershocks are already being felt in Pakistan—particularly in the overseas employment sector that sustains millions of households and supports the national economy through remittances.
Muhammad Hasnain, a young resident of Attock district, represents the human face of this unfolding crisis. Having secured a factory job in Saudi Arabia after taking a loan, he was preparing to depart and support his eight-member family. His ticket was confirmed, and his luggage packed. But just hours before his flight, he was told not to go to the airport. The company that had hired him abruptly suspended worker arrivals until the situation stabilises. Now, Hasnain is trapped in uncertainty—jobless and burdened with debt repayment.
His predicament mirrors that of thousands of Pakistanis whose overseas employment plans have been put on hold despite having completed all necessary documentation. Beyond them, more than nine million Pakistanis currently working in Gulf countries face an even greater risk: job losses if the conflict escalates or persists.
Remittances are not merely an economic indicator for Pakistan—they are a lifeline. During the last fiscal year, Pakistan received $38.3 billion in remittances, marking a 26% increase compared to the previous year. A significant 54.1% of this—around $20.7 billion—came from Gulf countries alone, underlining the country’s heavy reliance on the region.
This dependence becomes even more critical when viewed against Pakistan’s broader economic structure. The country’s exports stood at $32.1 billion, while imports surged to $58.38 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of over $26 billion. With foreign direct investment remaining limited, remittances play a decisive role in bridging this gap and stabilising foreign exchange reserves. Any disruption to this inflow could trigger currency depreciation, intensify inflation, and deepen economic instability.
Data from the Bureau of Emigration and Overseas Employment reveals that between 2011 and 2025, nearly 10 million Pakistanis went abroad for work, with about 90% heading to Gulf countries. Saudi Arabia alone hosts over half of these workers, followed by the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Iraq. These migrant workers not only sustain their families but also form the backbone of Pakistan’s external financial inflows.
The importance of overseas employment is further underscored by Pakistan’s demographic realities. The country has one of the youngest populations in the world, with over 40% comprising youth. Each year, around two million young people enter the job market, yet the domestic economy struggles to absorb them. For many, migration to the Gulf is not just an opportunity but a necessity.
Experts caution that the immediate impact of a prolonged conflict on Pakistan’s labour market could be severe. Estimates suggest that between 114,000 and 228,000 workers may be unable to travel abroad this year due to disruptions. If conditions worsen, this number could rise to 380,000, and in an extreme scenario, even reach 1.4 million. Such a situation would not only increase unemployment domestically but also reduce remittance inflows by an estimated $4.3 billion.
The economic fallout would not stop there. Pakistan’s exports to the Middle East—already accounting for around 11% of total exports—are being affected. Meanwhile, global oil prices have surged by up to 50% due to rising tensions. If key supply routes such as the Strait of Hormuz remain disrupted, oil prices could climb to between $120 and $150 per barrel. This would significantly raise Pakistan’s monthly oil import bill, potentially pushing inflation from the current 7% to as high as 17%.
For Pakistan, therefore, the stakes are extraordinarily high. The ongoing conflict is not just a distant geopolitical issue—it is a direct threat to the country’s economic lifeline. If remittance flows are disrupted and overseas employment declines, the consequences could be devastating, affecting everything from household incomes to national financial stability.
In a country already facing economic challenges, the continuation of war could turn a fragile situation into a full-blown crisis.
Monitoring desk:
Out are buzzwords like efficiency, over-hiring, and too many management layers. Today, all explanations stem from artificial intelligence (AI).
In recent weeks, giants including Google, Amazon, Meta, as well as smaller firms such as Pinterest and Atlassian, have all announced or warned of plans to shrink their workforce, pointing to developments in AI that they say are allowing their firms to do more with fewer people. “I think that 2026 is going to be the year that AI starts to dramatically change the way that we work,” Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg said in January.
Since then, his firm, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, has axed hundreds of people, including 700 just last week. Meta, which plans to nearly double spending on AI this year, is still hiring in “priority areas”, a spokesman said.
But more job cuts are expected in the months ahead, while a hiring freeze is in place at many parts of the firm.
Additional tariff on trade with Iran: China’s response to the US
Monitoring desk
London
President Donald Trump has announced that any country maintaining business ties with Iran will face a 25 per cent tariff on trade with the United States.
In a post on his Truth Social account on Monday, the US president said: “Effective immediately, any Country doing business with the Islamic Republic of Iran will pay a Tariff of 25% on any and all business being done with the United States of America.”
He added that the decision was “final and conclusive,” though he offered no further details on how the policy would be implemented. Under US trade rules, such tariffs are paid by American importers of goods from the affected countries. Iran has long been under heavy US sanctions, but Trump’s declaration signals a wider attempt to punish its international trading partners as well.
Major destinations for Iranian exports include China, the United Arab Emirates and India. Shortly after the announcement, China pushed back strongly, saying it opposed what it called unilateral sanctions and extraterritorial pressure. “China firmly opposes the indiscriminate use of tariffs. Trade wars have no winners, and coercion cannot resolve problems,” a spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington said on X.
The move comes as Iran faces its largest wave of anti-government protests in years. Trump has said the US is in contact with Iranian opposition figures and has not ruled out stronger action, including military options, while also suggesting that dialogue remains possible.
Iran, for its part, said it is keeping communication channels with the United States open as the U.S. administration considers its next steps.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that airstrikes were among the options under consideration but stressed that diplomacy remained the president’s preferred path. “There are many options on the table, but diplomacy is always the first option for the President,” she said.
Trump has stepped up pressure on Tehran, which is facing widespread unrest. Thousands of people have been detained in nationwide protests in Iran since late December, according to activist groups, who estimate that between 200 and 500 people have been killed. Tariff wars and trade wars have no winners, and coercion and pressure cannot solve problems,” said Liu Pengyu, the embassy spokesperson. Inside Iran, the authorities have staged large pro-government rallies in a show of support for the leadership.
The difficulty is partly tied to the nature of the current macro development and Treasury market sentiment. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, the December rate cut is again priced as almost certain at close to a 90 percent probability, while January also carries more than a 90 percent chance of at least a 25-basis-point reduction.
Yet gold is showing an unusual reluctance to capitalize on this dovish shift. The disconnect suggests that rate expectations, while supportive, are no longer sufficient to drive the next leg higher without broader risk aversion accompanying them.
One factor shaping this hesitation is the broader improvement in Treasury-market sentiment. The ICE BofA Move Index, which helps to measure the fear in the US T-bond market, has fallen toward its lowest readings since 2021.
A quieter bond market implies reduced fear toward public-finance conditions, which lowers the urgency for defensive hedging. The environment is also being lifted by pockets of stabilization in the economic cycle, where select indicators show that activity is no longer deteriorating as sharply as earlier in the year.
The latest ADP report offered a mixed signal that tempers the bearish narrative. According to the payroll processor, private sector hiring fell by 32,000 jobs in November, reversing October’s estimated gain of 47,000 and underscoring ongoing weakness, particularly among small businesses that shed a net 120,000 positions.
Still, the report included subtle signs of improvement. Before Thanksgiving, the delayed September jobs report showed the economy added 119,000 net positions, and recent jobless-claims data pointed to no acceleration in layoffs.
ADP reported also that the slump in hiring remains concentrated in small firms, while larger companies continue to expand at a modest pace. The release therefore reinforces the view that the labour market is cooling, not collapsing, leaving the Federal Reserve more comfortable with its current easing trajectory.
Fresh softness in the services sector introduces an additional headwind for gold. The ISM Services PMI rose modestly to 52.6 in November, beating expectations and signalling continued expansion in business activity and new orders. According to Steve Miller, chair of the survey committee, the combination of stronger backlogs and ongoing demand points to the early stages of a recovery in services.
For gold, this resilience adds pressure because it dampens recession fears and eases the urgency for safe-haven flows, especially as inflation pressures in the sector have softened with the price index falling to its lowest since April.
Another factor weighing on sentiment comes from the industrial side. The Federal Reserve reported that US industrial production rose by 0.1 percent in September after a 0.3 percent decline the prior month. While the gain was driven entirely by utilities, the stabilization in manufacturing output nonetheless suggests that the contractionary phase is losing intensity.
The incremental signs that the industrial economy is not deteriorating further can act as a mild drag on upside potential.
The circa 2% gain for the Nikkei 225 came amid claims from BoJ Governor Ueda that the government’s economic stimulus plans will positively impact economic growth, although it would also have inflationary effects.
As such, the BoJ stand ready to raise rates this month, with the Government seemingly willing to tolerate the move. With Japanese 30-year bonds on the rise following a strong 10-year auction, stocks in the region are pushing higher after recent jitters.
In Europe, the carmakers are leading the push higher, with strong gains across the likes of BMW, Daimler, Porsche, Mercedes, Volkswagen, and Stellantis. This comes off the back of the news that Donald Trump could seek to reduce fuel economy standards implemented by Joe Biden, aiming at making it easier for automakers to sell fossil fuel cars.
While this is a move aimed at lowering costs for US consumers, it also provides a shot in the arm for European carmakers that have struggled to dominate the EV space given rampant Chinese competition.
The dollar has dropped into the lowest level on over a month, as traders gear up for a likely rate cut from the Fed next week. Yesterday’s ADP payrolls release certainly seemed to solidify claims that we will see the FOMC act, with the -32k figure marking the biggest one-month decline since March 2023.
Notably, it is a decline that is entirely based around small businesses, which saw a 120k drop while medium (+51k) and large (39k) companies increased employment. Part of the weakness we have seen around the dollar comes from the growing confidence that Kevin Hassett will take on the role as Fed chair in May.
The prospect of a chair that will spend his time trying to please the President brings the independence of the FOMC into question. Notably, we are seeing a steepening of the yield curve, where 2-year yields fall relative to 30-year yields as rising rate cut expectations are countered by fears of economic instability as the Fed drive up inflation through an aggressing easing policy under Hassett.
During a U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on 3 December, new evidence was presented suggesting that Ukrainian children abducted by Russia have been transferred to North Korea, where they are reportedly held in military-style camps.
The information, brought forward by Ukrainian journalist and media adviser Ostap Yarysh, marks one of the starkest escalations yet in Russia’s forced displacement campaign, a campaign already recognised internationally as a war crime and the subject of International Criminal Court indictments against Vladimir Putin and Russia’s Commissioner for Children, Maria Lvova-Belova.
The idea that abducted Ukrainian minors are being exported to one of the world’s most repressive dictatorships underscores the strategic and ideological nature of Russia’s actions.
These children are not “evacuees,” nor are they being “protected,” as the Kremlin insists. They are being trafficked, systematically removed from their homeland, stripped of identity, and transferred into environments designed to break them down and rebuild them in the image of the regimes that hold them.
The prolonged run up to the Autumn Budget caused a stock market frenzy as investors raced to pull out more than £10 billion in six months which was the longest selling havoc since record began in 2015.
November was the second worst month on record as investors took out £3.02 billion, according to Calastone funds network.
Edward Glyn, head of global markets at Calastone said this is “clear evidence” as to how much investors were worried about Rachel Reeves Budget.
Glyn said, “The political narrative has played havoc with UK savers in recent months. Never have we seen such consistent or large-scale selling before.”
“The recent period of policy uncertainty has clearly unsettled investors and, in some cases, prompted reactive decisions they may later regret,” he added.